Silicon Star 1, Nadd Hessa: check the sales behind an asking price
A building name identifies a search, but a usable price comparison also needs enough recent records for the same kind of apartment.
For an asking-price check on Silicon Star 1, begin with the exact building and the registered area. Home.ai's compact transaction sample contains 9 qualifying apartment records under the building label SILICON STAR 1 in Nadd Hessa. The sample window covers 2023-11-06 to 2026-11-03; the newest matching sampled record is dated 2026-01-06.
That last date belongs to this selected sample. It does not establish the date of the building's latest actual sale. A buyer who needs evidence for an offer today should ask for newer verified comparisons and investigate how closely they match the apartment.
Check the address before comparing the prices
The Silicon Star 1 building page uses the registered Nadd Hessa area and the building name supplied in the transaction data. A familiar community name or an abbreviated portal listing is not enough to establish that two records describe the same building.
Match the building and unit information in the property documents with the sale examples. Keep Silicon Star 1 separate from similarly named buildings. Check the bedroom count and size next. A record from the right area but a different building should enter the comparison only after its differences have been stated.
Our selection requires the exact registered area and building label, the Unit property type, a numeric bedroom label, positive price and size fields, and the Existing Properties registration label. Building names are trimmed and compared without case differences. This does not independently resolve aliases or certify a legal property identity.
What remains after the bedroom filter?
| Bedroom label | Sampled records | Newest sampled record | Price evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | 2026-01-06 | Below this article's price-display minimum |
| 2 | 6 | 2025-10-23 | Below this article's price-display minimum |
This article displays a group price only when that bedroom group has at least 20 sampled records. This is an editorial display rule, not a confidence guarantee. Passing the rule would still leave differences in area, floor, outlook, condition, occupancy and transaction date to investigate.
A small group can be described accurately by its count and dates without turning its middle price into a current building valuation. Multiplying the sample count by a sampling factor would not establish the number of suitable comparable homes. The sample is a selection of registered events, not a verified list of distinct apartments available to buy.
Keep the unit price and the purchase budget together
For a specific comparable, retain both the total consideration and the recorded size. A lower total price can come with a smaller apartment. A similar price per square metre can still imply a different purchase budget. Compare the underlying unit records before making adjustments for features absent from the register.
The building price-range guide explains why a building-wide median can combine unlike transactions. For the wider location, use Nadd Hessa's area evidence as a separate comparison level. Expanding to an area gives a larger search population, but it does not make those apartments identical to Silicon Star 1.
Request evidence that answers the offer question
Ask the seller's agent for dated comparable sales with the building and unit identifiers needed for verification. Record which examples have the same bedroom count and similar size. Ask what is known about condition and occupancy, and keep those observations separate from what the transaction record proves.
If recent exact matches are scarce, widen the search in an explicit order, such as date first and then nearby buildings. Keep the original narrow result visible. This lets both parties see whether a proposed price relies on an older sale, a different apartment or an assumption about a feature the register does not record.